◎译 名 633轰炸大队 ◎片 名 633 Squadron ◎年 代 1964 ◎产 地 英国/美国 ◎类 别 剧情/战争 ◎语 言 英语/德语 ◎上映日期 1964-06-24 ◎IMDb链接 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057811/ ◎豆瓣评分 6.4/10 from 94 users ◎豆瓣链接 https://douban.com/subject/1919089/ ◎片 长 102 分钟 ◎导 演 沃尔特·杰拉曼 Walter Grauman ◎编 剧 詹姆斯·克拉韦尔 James Clavell / 霍华德·科克 Howard Koch ◎主 演 Rita Tobin-Weske Angus Lennie 约翰·梅永 John Meillon Cavan Malone 迈克尔·古德利菲 Michael Goodliffe Wendy Hall 玛利亚·珀丝齐 Maria Perschy 唐纳德·休斯敦 Donald Houston 克里夫·罗伯逊 Cliff Robertson 乔治·查金思 George Chakiris 哈里·安德鲁斯 Harry Andrews Johnny Briggs 苏珊·弗默 Suzan Farmer Geoffrey Frederick 安妮·里德勒 Anne Ridler
◎标 签 二战 | 英国 | 战争 | 美国 | 空战 | 战争片 | 1964 | 飞行
◎简 介
In the spring of 1944 an RAF Mosquito Squadron are ordered to attack a German rocket fuel plant in Norway. The mission involves flying up a heavily defended fjord and bombing a cliff overhang in an attempt to bury the factory, which is built into the rock. I bought this on DVD in a '3 for lb20' offer, as I had fond memories of it from childhood, and it had been around 20 years since I last remember seeing it. I have to say that it's not nearly as good as I remembered it to be. The plot is full of cliches and there's the inevitable love interest for the lead. That said, there are points to recommend it. Cliff Robertson gives another reliable performance as the Wing Commander in charge of the squadron, and there are equally dependable turns from Harry Andrews and Donald Houston. The numerous flying sequences with the Mosquito Bombers are expertly filmed, and it's a real bonus to finally see the film in its correct 2.35:1 aspect ratio. The special effects aren't bad for 1964, and Ron Goodwin's famous score underpins the whole venture. The main problem that I have with the film is that it borrows heavily from 'The Dam Busters' in terms of plot, without ever scaling the heights (no pun intended) of that classic. It may have lush Panavision photography, better effects etc., but lacks the nail biting tension and expertly constructed drama of its predecessor. However, it's perfectly acceptable entertainment, if somewhat abrupt at the end. Was the above comment useful to you?